Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 26;3(3):e1897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001897

Table 1. Group by State by Valence interaction.

ROIs, Group by State by Valence interaction L/R Vol mm3 Talairach coord. x y z Gr. by St. by val. Inter. F-value Neu (Med. vs Rest), t-value (Pos+Neg)/2-Neu, t-value Main effect verbal report, F-value Interaction verbal report by Group, F-value
Ant. Insula/Inf. Frontal gyrus R 3822 38 20 12/39 24 11 4.6 X (p>0.4) 2.3 (E>N) 6.6 (G>P) X
Insula/post-/precentral gyrus L 5005 −40 −1 17/−60 −6 18 4.3 X (p>0.4) 2.2 (E>N) 5.3 (G>P) X
Sup.temporal gyrus/Inf. Parietal lobule (SII)/ post-central gyrus/ Insula R 4802 60 −29 14/52 −26 27/54 −22 32/49 −30 19 4.6 2.3 (Med.>Rest) 2.2 (E>N) X X
Precuneus/Sup. Parietal Lobule L 4102 −20 −54 39/−19 −62 53 4.1 X (p>0.4) 2.2 (E>N) 6.2 (G>P) X

Clusters extracted from the ROIs showing Group by State by Valence interaction (p<0. 05 corrected, repeated ANOVA). T-test comparing responses during meditation minus resting states for experts (E) vs. novices (N) during neutral sounds (Neu.) and during either positive and negative sounds minus neutral sounds ((Pos+Neg)/2-Neu) were run within in each of these ROIs (p<0.05). A 2*2 repeated ANOVA with verbal report (poor (P) vs. good (G)) and groups (experts vs. novices) was run in these ROIs on the response to positive and negative sounds during meditation blocks (12 experts and 10 novices). X indicates non-significant (p>0.05).