Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2007 Feb;24(2):137–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x

Table 2.

Prevalence of retinopathy (number and percentage affected)

ETDRS levels Overall (n = 896) Non-diabetic sample (n = 302) Diabetic sample (n = 594)
Any retinopathy* 14–43 122 (13.6%) 30 (9.9%) 92 (15.5%)
Non-diabetic retinopathy 14–15 23 (2.5%) 6 (2.0%) 17 (2.9%)
 Exudates or IRMA 14 3 (0.3%) 1 (0.3%) 2 (0.4%)
 Haemorrhages 15 20 (2.2%) 5 (1.7%) 15 (2.5%)
Diabetic retinopathy 20–43 99 (11.1%) 24 (7.9%) 75 (12.6%)
 Microaneurysms only 20 85 (9.5%) 21 (6.9%) 64 (10.8%)§
 Mild/moderate NPDR 35–43 14 (1.6%) 3 (1.0%) 11 (1.8%)
*

Includes all retinopathy (non-specific, i.e. no microaneurysms, and diabetic retinopathy).

Mild/moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR)—microaneurysms plus one or more of the following: venous loops > 0/1; soft exudates, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities or venous beading; retinal haemorrhages; hard exudates > 0/1; or soft exudates > 0/1.

P = 0.035 by Chi square, compared with the non-diabetic sample.

§

P = 0.065 by Chi square, compared with the non-diabetic sample.