Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 16;46(3):1045–1049. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01869-07

TABLE 1.

Clustering results and discriminatory power of the genotyping methods

Method No. of unique isolates No. of clustered isolates No. of clusters No. of distinct types Clustering rate (%) HGI
Spoligotyping 2 70 1 3 95.8 0.055
VNTR system with 12 old loci 19 53 10 29 59.7 0.788
VNTR system with 12 old loci + 3 ETRs 29 43 8 37 48.6 0.849
VNTR system with 12 old loci + spoligotyping 31 41 10 41 43.1 0.813
VNTR system with 15 basic loci 53 19 6 59 18.1 0.990
VNTR system with 15 basic loci + spoligotyping 54 18 6 60 16.7 0.991
VNTR system with 15 basic loci + Mtub29 55 17 6 61 15.3 0.992
VNTR system with 24 loci 55 17 6 61 15.3 0.992
VNTR system with 24 loci + spoligotyping 56 16 6 62 13.9 0.993
IS6110-RFLP 66 6 3 69 4.2 0.999