Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 22;28(7):2125–2137. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00740-07

TABLE 2.

Immunophenotypic characterization of UET-13 transfectants and EFT cells

MPC statusa CD marker Result forb:
EFT statusc SK-ES1
UET-13
UET-13TR
UET-13TR- EWS/FLI1
UET-13TR- EWS/ERG
RD-ES
Tet Tet+ Tet Tet+ Tet Tet+
M+ CD29 + + + + + + + + +
M+ CD59 + + + + + + + + +
M+ CD90 + + + + + + + + + E+
M+ CD105 + + + + + + + + +
M+ CD166 + + + + + + + + +
M+ CD44 + + + + + + +
M+ CD73 + + + + + + +
M+ CD10 + + + + Down + Down
M+ CD13 + + + + Down + Down
M+ CD49e + + + + Down + Down +
M+ CD61 + + + + Down + Down
M+ CD55 + + + + Down + + +
M+ CD54 Up Up + + E+
M(−) CD117 Up Up + + E+
M+/− CD271 Up Up + + E+
CD40 + + E+
CD56 + + E+
M(−) CD133 + +
M(−) CD14
M(−) CD34
M(−) CD45
a

M(−), negative for MPCs; M+/−, positive for BM-derived MPCs but negative after in vitro culture; M+, positive for MPCs.

b

+, most cells positive; −, negative; Up, up-regulated by tetracycline treatment; Down, down-regulated by tetracycline treatment. Boldface indicates the antigens the immunophenotypes of which were changed in favor of EFT. Tet, tetracycline negative; Tet+, tetracycline positive.

c

E+, positive for EFTs.