Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 3;105(10):3721–3726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710069105

Table 3.

Genetic models of trustworthiness (fraction returned in the trust game)

Model Heritability, h2 Common environment, c2 Unshared environment, e2 DIC Dbar pD
Swedish sample
    ACE 0.18 (0.08, 0.30) 0.17 (0.08, 0.28) 0.66 (0.56, 0.75) 11055.12 10889.78 165.34
    AE 0.32 (0.18, 0.45) 0.68 (0.55, 0.82) 11057.50 10899.70 157.71
    CE 0.27 (0.14, 0.41) 0.73 (0.60, 0.86) 11064.40 10924.20 140.25
    E 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 11130.9 11128.90 2.00
U.S. sample
    ACE 0.17 (0.05, 0.32) 0.12 (0.04, 0.25) 0.71 (0.60, 0.82) 10626.82 10493.75 133.07
    AE 0.28 (0.16, 0.40) 0.72 (0.60, 0.84) 10625.04 10494.13 130.91
    CE 0.24 (0.13, 0.34) 0.76 (0.66, 0.87) 10638.59 10529.65 108.94
    E 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 10680.27 10678.26 2.01

These results show that we consistently found a significant proportion of variability in trustworthiness is due to heritability, and that the best-fitting models are those that assume a role for genetic effects and the unshared environment (but not necessarily the common environment). For technical details, see Table 2 legend.