Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep 10;26(2):261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.07.003

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean CBF values of CBF images calculated with 2 different approaches. Compared to method A, method B yielded a significant (P < 0.0015 for both the simple subtraction and the sinc-subtraction based CBF calculation approaches, paired t-test) underestimation of global CBF. No significant global perfusion differences were found between the simple subtraction and sinc-subtraction based CBF calculation processes.