Table 1.
Summary of cases
| Age* | Sex | Number of Ray | FCR (%) | Ankle Morphology | Tarsal Coalition | LLD (mm) | Expected LLD (mm) | Operation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH 1 | 7 + 10 | M | 3 | 84 | B&S | T-Ca | 19 | 28.5 | |
| TH 2 | 8 + 5 | M | 3 | 82 | B&S | 19 | 27.0 | ||
| TH 3 | 5 + 4 | M | 4 | 86 | B&S | 18 | 31.9 | ||
| TH 4 | 4 + 2 | F | 4 | 85 | B&S | Ca-Cu | 14 | 25.2 | |
| TH 5 | 7 + 5 | M | 4 | 84 | B&S | T-Ca, T-N | 13 | 19.8 | |
| FH 1 | 6 + 2 | F | 3 | 74 | B&S | 23 | 34.3 | ||
| FH 2 | 4 + 4 | F | 4 | 73 | B&S | T-Ca, Ca-Cu | 33 | 58.4 | |
| FH 3 | 3 + 3 | M | 4 | 68 | B&S | 26 | 56.4 | ||
| FH 4 | 12 + 3 | F | 4 | 78 | B&S | Ca-Cu | 34 | 36.0 | Epiphysiodesis |
| FH 5 | 10 + 11 | M | 4 | 71 | B&S | T-Ca, T-N | 51 | 63.2 | Lengthening & Valgus deformity correction |
| FH 6 | 11 + 0 | M | 4 | 73 | B&S | T-Ca, Ca-Cu | 45 | 55.8 | Lengthening & Valgus deformity correction |
| FH 7 | 12 + 0 | M | 4 | 63 | B&S | T-Ca | 31 | 36.6 | Lengthening & Medial femoral epiphysis stapling |
FCR; femoral condylar ratio, LLD; leg length discrepancy, TH; terminal hemimelia, FH; fibular hemimelia, M; male, F; female, B&S; ball & socket, T-Ca; talocalcaneal, Ca-Cu; calcaneocuboidal, T-N; talonavicular
*Years + months