Skip to main content
. 1999 Jul 15;518(Pt 2):401–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0401p.x

Table 1.

Potential dependence of erg availability

Experiment f s kf(mV) ks(mV) V1/2,f(mV) V1/2,s(mV)
1 0.24 0.76 7.7 12.4 −70.3 −114.1
2 0.36 0.64 4.1 12.7 −71.5 −109.8
3 0.40 0.60 8.7 9.7 −78.3 −117.8
4 0.50 0.50 9.8 7.8 −60.2 −114.6
5 0.54 0.46 8.6 12.7 −74.9 −113.7
6 0.62 0.38 9.8 6.1 −85.4 −123.2
7 0.65 0.35 7.0 10.1 −78.2 −111.8
8 0.71 0.29 6.0 5.5 −74.8 −121.7
9 0.73 0.27 8.5 10.6 −71.4 −125.5
10 0.81 0.19 8.4 5.6 −74.7 −121.2
11 0.83 0.17 6.6 8.2 −70.6 −116.3
Mean ±s.e.m. 7.7 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.8 −73.7 ± 1.9 −117.2 ± 1.5

The potential dependence of erg-like channel availability was tested with a constant pulse to −120 mV preceded by 2 s prepulses to membrane potentials between 0 and −140 mV. The peak current amplitudes recorded with the test pulse were normalized, plotted against prepulse potential and fitted with the sum of two Boltzmann functions: f/(1 + exp(−(VV1/2,f)/kf)) +s/(1 + exp(−(VV1/2,s)/ks)). Abbreviations: f and s, relative amplitude of the fast and slow current component, respectively; kf and ks, slope factor of the Boltzmann function related to the fast and slow current component; V1/2,f and V1/2,s, prepulse potential at which 50% of the fast or slow current component is deactivated. Same experiments as those of Fig. 4.