Skip to main content
. 1999 Aug 1;518(Pt 3):735–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0735p.x

Table 2.

Overview of the effects of P1 and pH on ATPase activity and force development

30 mM P1 Control (0 P1)(%) 30 mM P1(%) Relative change(%)
  Total ATPase activity 100 82 ± 3 −18 ± 3*
  AM ATPase activity 58 ± 2 46 ± 3 −21 ± 6*
  SR ATPase activity 42 ± 2 38 ± 4 −9 ± 5 (P = 0.06)
  Isometric force 100 38 ± 2 −62 ± 2*
pH 6.2 Control (pH 7.1) (%) pH 6.2(%) Relative change(%)
  Total ATPase activity 100 72 ± 2 −28 ± 2*
  AM ATPase activity 65 ± 2 59 ± 4 −10 ± 4 (P = 0.07)
  SR ATPase activity 35 ± 2 14 ± 2 −61 ± 5*
  Isometric force 100 79 ± 5 −21 ± 5*
30 mM P1, pH 6.2 Relative change

Control(0 P1, pH 7.1) (%) 30 mM P1 pH 6.2(%) Experimental(%) Calculated(%)
  Total ATPase activity 100 47 ± 2 −53 ± 2* −41 ± 3
  AM ATPase activity 59 ± 2 40 ± 3 −32 ± 7* −29 ± 3
  SR ATPase activity 41 ± 2 8 ± 2 −80 ± 6* −64 ± 5
  Isometric force 100 37 ± 3 −63 ± 3* −70 ± 3

The mean values for the total ATPase activity per volume, and force per cross-sectional area were, respectively, 0.26 ± 0.01 mM s−1 and 59 ± 3 kN m−1 (n = 44). The AM and SR ATPase activities are expressed relative to the total ATPase activity without BDM and added P1. The relative changes were calculated from individual values relative to the bracketing control values. Values are means ± S.E.M. from 10 (30 mM P1), 6 (pH 6.2) and 8 (30 mM P1, pH 6.2) different preparations. The calculated relative change with 30 mM P1 at pH6.2 was obtained from the product of the effects of 30 mM P1 and pH 6.2 alone.

*

P < 0.05 compared with control

no overlap between experimental and calculated values ± s.e.m.