Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec 1;521(Pt 2):409–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00409.x

Figure 1. Current-voltage and dose-response relationships of follicular responses generated by ACh.

Figure 1

A, membrane current-voltage relationships of Fin (•) and IK,cAMP (▴) elicited by FSH (0.25 μg ml−1), and during IK,cAMP inhibition (○) by 0.1 μm ACh. Each point indicates the mean (±s.e.m.) from 4-7 follicles (3 frogs) tested in each condition. Reversal potentials for the currents were -21.6 ± 3, -98 ± 2 and -55 ± 9 mV, respectively. B, top traces: follicular Fin elicited by ACh applied consecutively at concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 10 μm, with 10 min wash intervals in NR solution. The ACh applications started at the point indicated by the arrow and lasted about 80 s. The superimposed traces are from a single epithelium-removed follicle held at -60 mV. Bottom, 10 μm ACh application in a defolliculated oocyte from the same frog. C, top traces: inhibition of IK,cAMP (generated by FSH) by increasing concentrations of ACh (0, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 nm, with 15 min wash intervals). Data from 1 follicle held at -40 mV. In this and subsequent records, the bars indicate the time of drug application, and voltage steps of +20 mV (2 s) were applied periodically to monitor membrane conductance. Bottom, FSH application in a defolliculated oocyte from the same frog. D, dose-response relationships for activation of Fin (•) and inhibition of IK,cAMP (○) normalized with respect to the maximal response. Means (±s.e.m.) of 12-16 follicles from 5 frogs. Curves are fits to the equation:
graphic file with name tjp0521-0409-mu1.jpg
by the method of non-linear least squares fitting, where EC50 is the half-maximal effective concentration of ACh, nH is the slope factor (Hill coefficient), A1 and A2 are the initial and final normalized I values, respectively, and [ACh] is the concentration of the neurotransmitter.