Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec 1;521(Pt 2):409–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00409.x

Figure 2. Dose-response relationships of muscarinic antagonists on follicular responses to ACh.

Figure 2

A, effect of 4-DAMP on Fin generated by 800 nm ACh. The traces on the right show 4-DAMP blockade of Fin elicited by ACh; the trace on the left is the control current. Wash periods were of 10 min. Data from a single follicle. B, blocking effect of 1 μm PZP, TPC, MTT or 4-DAMP on 8 nm ACh inhibition of IK,cAMP generated by 2 μm ADE (open bar below each trace). Superimposed traces in each group correspond to control current (ADE alone; 1), IK,cAMP inhibition in the presence of ACh and ADE (2), and the same as 2 plus the antagonist which was superfused for 100 s before ACh application (3). Wash intervals were of 15 min. Data from different follicles (2 frogs). C and D, dose-antagonist relationships for the effect of 4-DAMP (squares), MTT (circles), PZP (triangles) and TPC (diamonds) on Fin activation (C) and IK,cAMP inhibition (D) elicited by ACh at the EC50 concentration. Curves were fitted using the same equation as for Fig. 1D, and each point represents the mean of 4-5 follicles from 2 frogs. IK,cAMP was generated by 2 μm ADE or 2 μg ml−1 FSH.