Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar 15;523(Pt 3):685–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00685.x

Table 1.

Pooled data for responses to ATP obtained under different conditions and in different classes of cells

Row no. Experimental conditions Order of drug application Sensitive to Caps? n Amplitude (nA) Rise time(10–90%)(ms) Decay time(90–10%)(s) Fast IM Slow
1 Capsaicin applied in ATP first Yes 9 0.77 ± 0.28 163 ± 73 7.2 ± 1.7 0 6 3
2 normal extracellular ATP first No 16 1.01 ± 0.19 221 ± 78 5.8 ± 1.5 4 5 7
3 solution ATP after Caps Yes 15 1.17 ± 0.17 43.7 ± 11.1 1.2 ± 0.5 10 3 2
4 ATP after Caps No 8 0.81 ± 0.20 304 ± 152 5.1 ± 2.3 4 1 3
5 Capsaicin applied in ATP after caps Yes 7 0.52 ± 0.14 608 ± 458 5.5 ± 2.5 0 3 4
6 Ca2+-free solution ATP after Caps No 5 1.95 ± 0.88 90.4 ± 54.4 5.4 ± 2.9 2 2 1
7 BAPTA replacing ATP first Yes 6 1.08 ± 0.26 57.3 ± 28.5 3.1 ± 1.8 3 2 1
8 EGTA in pipette ATP first No 5 0.68 ± 0.12 15.6 ± 6.9 3.8 ± 2.8 2 3 0
9 solution ATP after Caps Yes 8 0.79 ± 0.27 54.0 ± 18.8 5.8 ± 2.7 4 3 1
10 ATP after Caps No 8 1.62 ± 0.42 216 ± 206 4.3 ± 2.4 4 3 1
11 Prior step to +40 mV ATP first 9 1.68 ± 0.40 19.4 ± 7.1 0.7 ± 0.3 7 2 0
12 Prior step to +40 mV in ‘Ca2+ free’ ATP first 5 3.27 ± 0.25 32.0 ± 12.0 0.7 ± 0.5 4 1 0

Each row is numbered for easy identification from the text and has a brief description of the experimental conditions, indicates whether ATP was applied to the cell before or after capsaicin (Caps), whether the cells in that group were capsaicin sensitive or insensitive, the total number (n) of cells in the group, the mean value (mean ±s.e.m.) of the amplitude, rise time10–90% and decay time90–10% and how many cells in the group could be classified as having either ‘fast’, ‘intermediate’ (IM) or ‘slow’ responses.