Skip to main content
. 2000 Sep 1;527(Pt 2):249–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00249.x

Table 2.

Effects of ωCgtx GVIA, ωAga IVA, nifedipine and ryanodine on gK,Ca1 in the presence of 9AC

Single action potential Action potential train


Current peak (nA) Total charge(pC) Current peak(nA) Total charge(pC)
9AC (n = 5) 0.32 ± 0.06 41.9 ± 12.4 0.72 ± 0.08 190 ± 31
9AC +ωCgtx GVIA 0.14 ± 0.03 ** 12.1 ± 4.2 * 0.46 ± 0.08 * 111 ± 31 **
9AC (n = 5) 0.47 ± 0.06 75.5 ± 16.7 0.80 ± 0.08 329 ± 48
9AC +ωAga IVA 0.46 ± 0.05 74.0 ± 11.4 0.90 ± 0.08 371 ± 36
9AC (n = 11) 0.44 ± 0.03 62.2 ± 4.8 0.87 ± 0.05 290 ± 24
9AC + nifedipine 0.41 ± 0.03 50.0 ± 5.3 * 0.94 ± 0.07 277 ± 21
9AC (n = 7) 0.39 ± 0.03 82.7 ± 17.7 0.66 ± 0.07 352 ± 64
9AC + ryanodine 0.33 ± 0.03 60.6 ± 8.0 0.63 ± 0.09 298 ± 47

Tail currents after a single action potential or after a train of six action potentils at 40 Hz were recorded in voltage clamp at a holding potential of −55 mV. Outward Ca2+activated K+ currents were isolated by blocking gCl,Ca with 2 nm. Changes after adding nifedipine (10 μm), ωCgtx GVIA (300 nm), ωAga IVA (40 nm) or ryanodine (20 μm) were compared using Student's paired t test

*

P < 0.05

**

P < 0.01.