Skip to main content
. 2000 Sep 15;527(Pt 3):633–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x

Table 2.

Results of the 2factorial repeated measurement ANOVAs conducted for experiments 1–4

Expt no. Variables d.f. F values P values
1 Current flow 1 2.427 0.1579
Electrode position 5 0.560 0.7299
Polarity of current stimulation 1 1.502 0.2552
Current flow × electrode position 5 0.827 0.5383
Current flow × polarity of current stimulation 1 7.744 0.0238 *
Electrode position × polarity of current stimulation 5 2.613 0.0389 *
Current flow × electrode position × polarity of current stimulation 5 0.650 0.6633
2 Time course 10 1.442 0.1658
Polarity of current stimulation 1 48.875 < 0.0001 *
Polarity of current stimulation × time course 10 10.289 < 0.0001 *
3 Duration of current stimulation 4 5.295 0.0011 *
Time course 5 14.790 < 0.0001 *
Duration of current stimulation × time course 20 2.768 0.0001 *
4 Intensity of current stimulation 4 6.011 0.004 *
Time course 5 23.798 < 0.0001 *
Intensity of current stimulation × time course 20 3.736 < 0.0001 *

The results of experiment 1 show that the effect of current flow depends on electrode position and polarity of current flow. For experiment 2, the ANOVA reveals a dependency of the aftereffect on polarity of current stimulation and an interaction of polarity and time course. As shown by the results of experiments 3 and 4, the independent variables – current duration, stimulation intensity and time course after current stimulation – determine the MEP size. Furthermore, the interactions between time course, stimulation duration and intensity indicate prolonged effects of longer and more intense stimulation on MEP size. d.f., degrees of freedom. *P < 0.05.