Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct 15;528(Pt 2):359–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00359.x

Table 1.

Parameters of a Gaussian model applied to the PDF of the fluctuations in [PCr] measurement

Rest Moderate exercise


Subject no. n xcr (%) xcrC95 (%) w (%) wC95 (%) sr n xcw (%) xcwC95 (%) w (%) wC95 (%) sw
 1 192 −0.103 0.148 2.549 0.366 1.275* 108 −0.146 0.278 3.073 0.773 1.537*
 2 82 −0.132 0.429 3.990 2.514 1.995* 47 −0.220 0.309 2.066 0.762 1.033*
 3 192 0.094 0.103 2.485 0.253 1.243* 114 −0.093 0.159 4.113 0.645 2.057*
 4 75 0.058 0.081 2.432 0.197 1.216* 35 −0.101 0.233 2.775 0.603 1.388*
 5 210 −0.021 0.211 2.752 0.544 1.376 100 −0.066 0.167 2.737 0.430 1.369*
 6 49 0.026 0.668 4.435 3.145 2.218* 41 −0.556 0.755 3.397 2.278 1.699*
 Mean 133 −0.013 0.273 3.107 1.170 1.554* 74 −0.197 0.317 3.027 0.915 1.514*
s.d. 72 0.090 0.230 0.874 1.306 0.437 37 0.184 0.223 0.691 0.679 0.346
Group response: all data 800 0.002 0.130 2.745 0.335 1.37* 445 −0.124 0.181 3.209 0.522 1.60*

Model parameters of the probability density function for the ‘noise’ fluctuation in [PCr] measurement for each subject at rest and during the steady state of moderate exercise, and fitted with a Gaussian function. n, number of points; xcr and xcw, centre of peak at rest and work, respectively; w, 2 × variance (ω); C95, 95% confidence interval of estimation; sr and sw, standard deviation from the Gaussian model during rest and work, respectively.

*

Not significantly different from a Gaussian distribution using χ2 goodness-of-fit (P > 0.05).