Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 14;9(5):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e37

Table 5.

Randomized controlled trials with HbA1c data (see Multimedia Appendix for full tables containing inclusion criteria and data gathering methods)

Study Trial Duration (months) Intervention Control Quality Score [12]
N Baseline and Follow-Up Values ± SD Mean Difference ± SD N Baseline and Follow-Up Values ± SD Mean Difference ± SD
Biermann [15] 4 27 8.3 ± 2.3
6.9 ± 1.3
−1.4 ± 2.0* 16 8.0 ± 2.1
7.0 ± 1.0
−1.0 ± 1.82 3
McKay (a) [30] 3 37 7.75 ± 1.33
7.73 ± 1.42
−0.02 ± 1.38* 33 7.20 ± 1.36
7.37 ± 1.49
0.17 ± 1.43 3
McKay (b) [30] 3 30 7.64 ± 1.71
7.59 ± 1.66
−0.06 ± 1.69* 33 7.20 ± 1.36
7.37 ± 1.49
0.17 ± 1.43 3
McKay (c) [30] 3 33 7.46 ± 1.35
7.28 ± 1.28
−0.18 ± 1.32* 33 7.20 ± 1.36
7.37 ± 1.49
0.17 ± 1.43 3
Farmer [19] 9 47 9.2 ± 1.1
8.6 ± 1.4
−0.62 ± 2.42 46 9.3 ± 1.5§
8.9 ± 1.4
−0.38 ± 2.36 2
McMahon [31]|| 12 52 10.0 ± 0.8 −1.6 ± 1.4 52 9.9 ± 0.8
−1.2 ± 1.4 2
Jansa [25] 12 18 8.4 ± 1.2
7.6 ± 0.9
−0.8 ± 0.74§ 15 8.9 ± 1.3
7.6 ± 0.7
−1.3 ± 0.64 3
Larizza [27] 12 15 8.40 ± 2.53
7.75 ± 1.16
−0.65 ± 2.20* 14 10.15 ± 3.25
9.28 ± 2.34
−0.87 ± 2.90 2

*Imputation technique.

Intervention (a) was personal self-management coach (n = 37), intervention (b) was peer support (n = 30), and intervention (c) was combined condition (n = 33).

Calculated using 95% CI.

§Calculated using P values provided by author.

||Precise follow-up data were not reported.

Data from location 2 (adults) of the study, see Table 3.