Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 18;205(2):295–303. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071297

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cardiac rupture after AMI is caused by periostin disruption. (A) Schema of the targeting strategy deletes the first exon of periostin locus. (B) Decreased survival of periostin −/− mice (n = 91) compared with the survival of +/+ mice (n = 80) after AMI. **, P < 0.0001. (C) Infarct LV wall stiffness was more reduced in periostin −/− mice than in +/+ mice after AMI (left). Mean passive stiffness was also significantly lower in the −/− mice than in the +/+ mice after AMI (right). Open columns, +/+; filled columns, −/−. **, P < 0.005, compared with +/+ mice. (D) Loss of periostin attenuated cardiac dilation after AMI, as shown by echocardiography. Open columns, +/+; filled columns, −/−. *, P < 0.05 compared with +/+ mice. (E) Histological analysis of heart sections from periostin −/− and +/+ mice stained with toluidine blue 5 d after AMI, showing a lower number of cardiac fibroblasts and lower ECM density in −/− mice. (right) The number of vimentin-positive cells. *, P < 0.02, compared with +/+ mice. (F) Images of the infarct border stained with anti-collagen I (left), and TEM images of infarct border, showing evidence of smaller and less abundant collagen in tissues from periostin −/− mice 5 d after AMI compared with the collagen of the +/+ infarct heart. Bar, 50 μm. (G) CSA distribution of collagen fibrils in the infarct border of +/+ and −/− mice, measured from TEM images. (H) Biochemical analysis of the collagen amount and cross-linking. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, compared with +/+ mice. (I) The number of αSMA-positive cells in the infarct area was reduced in periostin −/− mice 5 d after AMI. (right) The number of αSMA-positive cells. **, P < 0.01, compared with +/+ mice. Error bars represent the mean ± the SEM. Bars, 200 μm.