Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 5;116(6):845–857. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0718-2

Table 2.

Estimation of detection chance per QTL

QTL Detected in Allelic effectb Average marker distancec Segregation ratio in F2d Frequency genotype “homozygous L. saligna Detection chance in F2 Detection chance in BILse
Rbq1 F2 + pBIL7.2 dom 2.1 37:44:8 0.09 0.91 0.98
Rbq3/rbq3a F2 + BIL9.2 dom/rec 2.7 29:49:9 0.11 0.86/ 0.38 0.98
Rbq2 F2 dom 2 1:2:1 0.25 0.81 0.98
rbq7 BIL4.2 rec 2.5 1:2:1 0.25 0.79 0.98
rbq5 BIL2.2 rec 3.9 1:2:1 0.25 0.74 0.98
rbq6 BIL6.3 rec 3.3 36:46:9 0.10 0.34 0.98
rbq4 BIL8.2 rec 2.3 30:90:6 0.05 0.15 0.98

aThe inheritance of rbq3 is still ambiguous

bdom = dominant, rec = recessive

cAverage marker distance in QTL mapping region

dThe segregation ratio in F2 between genotypes (a:h:b); a = homozygous L. sativa, h = heterozygous, b = homozygous L. saligna

eNote that the detection chance in BILs does not depend on any of the factors that vary between the F2-detected QTLs