Table 1.
P value | differences | |
---|---|---|
TZ | 0.0123 | 1 and 3 or 4 |
TZ slope U | 0.0007 | 1 and 2, 3 or 4 |
TZ slope L | 0.0030 | 1 and 2, 3, or 4 |
ROM | 0.0010 | 1 and 3 or 4 |
2 and 4 | ||
H Width | 0.0494 | none* |
H Area | 0.0040 | 1 and 3 or 4 |
2 and 3 or 4 |
TZ = transitional zone, TZ slope U = transitional zone slope upper arm, TZ slope L = transitional zone slope lower arm, ROM = range of motion, H Width = width of the hysteresis loop at 0 load, H Area = area within hysteresis loop.
P values from one way ANOVA of average parameter (specimen mean of value for the 3 loading rates, n = 15).
Pair-wise differences between grades based on post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests.
No differences between grade pairs on post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests despite P value <0.05