Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Sep 21;23(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.006

Table 1.

Effect of degenerative grade (1-4) on average motion parameters (mean of 3 loading rates)

P value differences
TZ 0.0123 1 and 3 or 4
TZ slope U 0.0007 1 and 2, 3 or 4
TZ slope L 0.0030 1 and 2, 3, or 4
ROM 0.0010 1 and 3 or 4
2 and 4
H Width 0.0494 none*
H Area 0.0040 1 and 3 or 4
2 and 3 or 4

TZ = transitional zone, TZ slope U = transitional zone slope upper arm, TZ slope L = transitional zone slope lower arm, ROM = range of motion, H Width = width of the hysteresis loop at 0 load, H Area = area within hysteresis loop.

P values from one way ANOVA of average parameter (specimen mean of value for the 3 loading rates, n = 15).

Pair-wise differences between grades based on post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests.

*

No differences between grade pairs on post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests despite P value <0.05