Table 1.
Scales | Number of items | Interpretation | Sample items with response patterns |
---|---|---|---|
Composite risk perception | 26 | Higher score indicates greater overall perceived risk related to diabetes and its complications. | Items from 5 subscales: personal control, worry, optimistic bias, comparative disease risk, environmental risk |
Personal control | 4 | Higher score indicates more perceived control, less perceived risk. | “My own efforts can help control my risks of getting diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
Worry | 2 | Higher score indicates more worry Regarding diabetes complications. | “I worry about getting diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
Optimistic bias | 2 | Higher score indicates more optimistic bias; lower score is more realism/pessimism. | “Compared to other people with diabetes of my same age and sex, I am less likely than they are to get diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
Comparative disease risk | 9 | Higher score indicates greater comparative disease risk of 9 conditions. | How would you rate your risk of: heart attack; blindness; cancer...? |
Almost no risk, slight risk, moderate risk, high risk | |||
Environmental risk | 9 | Higher score indicates greater perceived risk from 9 environmental conditions. | How would you rate your risk from: violent crime; extreme weather (hot or cold); air pollution…?
Almost no risk, slight risk, moderate risk, high risk |
Risk knowledge | 5 | Higher score indicates greater knowledge of diabetes complications. | Having a yearly eye exam, does this…
Increase the risk, have no effect on the risk, or decrease the risk of diabetes complications? |