Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.020

Table 1.

Description of the Risk Perception Survey–Diabetes Mellitus (RPS-DM)

Scales Number of items Interpretation Sample items with response patterns
Composite risk perception 26 Higher score indicates greater overall perceived risk related to diabetes and its complications. Items from 5 subscales: personal control, worry, optimistic bias, comparative disease risk, environmental risk
Personal control 4 Higher score indicates more perceived control, less perceived risk. “My own efforts can help control my risks of getting diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree
Worry 2 Higher score indicates more worry Regarding diabetes complications. “I worry about getting diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree
Optimistic bias 2 Higher score indicates more optimistic bias; lower score is more realism/pessimism. “Compared to other people with diabetes of my same age and sex, I am less likely than they are to get diabetes complications.”
Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree
Comparative disease risk 9 Higher score indicates greater comparative disease risk of 9 conditions. How would you rate your risk of: heart attack; blindness; cancer...?
Almost no risk, slight risk, moderate risk, high risk
Environmental risk 9 Higher score indicates greater perceived risk from 9 environmental conditions. How would you rate your risk from: violent crime; extreme weather (hot or cold); air pollution…?
Almost no risk, slight risk, moderate risk, high risk
Risk knowledge 5 Higher score indicates greater knowledge of diabetes complications. Having a yearly eye exam, does this…
Increase the risk, have no effect on the risk, or decrease the risk of diabetes complications?