Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 12;93(3):467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.10.005

Table 1.

Effect of bilateral accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) lesions on mating behavior in male mice

Behavior Sham-operated Control (n=8): Complete AOB Lesion (n=5): Partial AOB Lesion (n=5):
Anogenital investigation:
 Percentage showing (%): 100 100 100
 Latency (min): 1.4±0.3 1.5±0.2 1.3±0.2
 Number per test: 7.0±1 7.0±1 6.0±1
Mounts (with and without intromission):
 Percentage showing (%): 100 100 100
 Latency (min): 15.3±4.7 23.4±9.7 37.1±22.5
 Number per test: 55.0±15 50.0±5 82.0±29
Mounts per Minute: 0.4±0.2 0.4±0.1 0.6±0.2
Mounts (with intromission):
 Percentage showing (%): 85.7 100 100
 Latency (min): 12.9±3.0 95.8±37.6 40.0±21.9
 Number per test: 31.0±11 29.0±6 45.0±12
Percentage of mounts leading to intromission: 53.3±10.4 60.0±12.7 59.8±11
Ejaculations:
 Percentage showing (%): 42.9 80 60
 Latency (min): 177.6±39.6 117.0±29.1 122.1±47.8

The data are expressed as mean±SEM.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure