Skip to main content
. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):7092–7096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7092

Table 1.

Similarity between patterns of enhanced coherence

Verbal
Visual
p r p r
Inline graphic 1
0 1
δ Inline graphic 0 0 1
0 0 0 1
Inline graphic 1
0 1
θ Inline graphic 0 0 1
0 0.35 0 1
Inline graphic 1
0 1
α2 Inline graphic 0.31 0 1
0 0.22 0.27 1
Inline graphic 1
0 1
α1 Inline graphic 0 0.11 1
0 0.21 0.60 1
Inline graphic 1
0 1
β Inline graphic 0.27 0.12 1
0.40 0 0.14 1
Inline graphic 1
0.54 1
γ Inline graphic 0.60 0.42 1
0.41 0.42 0.52 1

The table compares the EEG coherence patterns of the two task conditions (visual and verbal) in each frequency band for both perception (p) and retention (r). The similarity S between two patterns is quantified as the ratio of equal connections with respect to the total number of connections in both maps. For example, Fig. 3 A and B share eight connections (Fr-T5; Fp2-T5; Fz-T5; Fp1-T5). Dividing by 23, the total number of connections, gives S = 0.35. In θ, the patterns during retention were highly similar but different from all other conditions; in γ, all patterns showed a high degree of similarity. (In the diagonals, patterns are compared to themselves, leading to a similarity of S = 1.)