Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.018

Table 6.

Body composition at 6th grade (spring 2003) and 8th grade (spring 2005 and spring 2006) by treatment group, Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG)

Intervention mean** Control mean** Difference
mean 95% CI
Age (years) 6th grade*** 11.9 12.0 −0.0 −0.1, 0.2
8th grade—spring 2005 14.0 14.0 0.0 −0.0, 0.1
8th grade—spring 2006 14.0 14.0 0.0 −0.1, 0.1
Height (cm) 6th grade 152.3 152.4 −0.1 −0.8, 0.6
8th grade—spring 2005 160.1 160.2 −0.1 −0.8, 0.6
8th grade—spring 2006 159.7 159.9 −0.2 −0.9, 0.5
Weight (kg) 6th grade 48.6 49.1 −0.5 −2.5, 1.5
8th grade—spring 2005 58.4 59.1 −0.6 −1.7, 0.4
8th grade—spring 2006 58.4 58.2 0.2 −1.2, 1.6
BMI (kg/m2) 6th grade 20.7 20.9 −0.2 −1.0, 0.6
8th grade—spring 2005 22.7 22.9 −0.2 −0.6, 0.2
8th grade—spring 2006 22.8 22.7 0.1 −0.4, 0.7
Triceps skinfold thickness (mm) 6th grade 17.2 17.4 −0.2 −1.4, 1.0
8th grade—spring 2005 21.2 21.6 −0.3 −1.2, 0.6
8th grade—spring 2006 21.2 20.8 0.4 −0.5, 1.4
* Percent body fat 6th grade 27.8 28.1 −0.3 −1.7, 1.2
8th grade—spring 2005 31.5 31.8 −0.3 −1.2, 0.6
8th grade—spring 2006 31.5 31.3 0.2 −0.6, 1.1
*

Percent body fat = −23.911 + 2.283 * BMI + 1.917 * triceps – 0.057 * (BMI * triceps) – 0.492 * age –3.122 * black_race

**

School means adjusted for race in stage 1 model. These adjusted school means are the dependent variable in Stage 2 model, with treatment group as a fixed effect and school nested within geographic location and site as random effects.

***

6th grade—spring 2003 (n=1721)

8th grade—spring 2005 (n=3504)

8th grade—spring 2006 (n=3502)

a

None of the differences were statistically significant (p>0.05).