Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 13;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-47

Table 4.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for msh1 and 18S (in parenthesis).

Comparison tested d.f. Sum of squares Variance component % variation ΦST
Between habitats (shallow Vs deep)
Among populations 1 (1) 84. 89 (55.599) 1.29890 (0.79038)Va 66.87 (49.27) 0.66873 (0.49266)***
Within populations 128 (141) 82.36 (114.765) 0.64345 (0.81394)Vb 33.13 (50.73)
Total 129 (142) 167.254 (170.364) 1.94235 (1.60431)
Between morphotypes (shallowtype Vs deeptype)
Among populations 1 (1) 130.412 (108.532) 2.06222 (1.59683)Va 87.89 (78.45) 0.87891 (0.78455)***
Within populations 128 (141) 36.084 (61.832) 0.28413 (0.43852)Vb 12.11 (21.55)
Total 129 (142) 167.254 (170.364) 1.94235 (2.03536)
Between reefs (Romero Vs Media Luna)
Among populations 1 (1) 1.702 (0.642) 0.00829 (0.01242)Va 0.64 (0.96) 0.00637 (0.01043)
Within populations 128 (107) 165.552 (128.744) 1.29338 (1.20321)Vb 99.36 (99.04)
Total 129 (108) 167.254 (129.385) 1.94235 (1.19079)
Between reefs considering shallow populations only (Romero Vs Media Luna Vs Culebra)
Among populations 2 (2) 0.921 (1.790) 0.00157 (0.00257)Va 0.37 (0.30) 0.00366 (0.00305)
Within populations 65 (74) 27.844 (62.210) 0.42837 (0.84067)Vb 99.63 (99.70)
Total 67 (76) 167.254 (64.000) 1.94235 (0.84324)
Among reefs with different depth profiles (Media Luna Vs Romero Vs Culebra)
Among populations 2 (2) 15.034 (4.639) 0.18265 (0.03526)Va 13.22 (2.91) 0.13223 (0.02911)***
Within populations 127 (120) 152.22 (141.101) 1.19859 (1.17584)Vb 86.78 (97.09)
Total 129 (122) 167.254 (145.740) 1.94235 (1.21110)

Comparisons of population were made among depth profiles, morphotypes and reefs. The significance of the ΦST values were obtained by randomizations of 10,000 permutations. P < 0.001 is represented by ***. Sampling in Culebra is limited to shallow habitats.