Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 31;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-8-7

Table 5.

Statistical Analysis of Modelling Methods.

Statistical Analysis
Relation A < B A < C A < D A < E A < F A < G A < H

Score 3.20E-04 6.25E-05 5.53E-06 4.89E-05 7.61E-05 2.27E-05 1.72E-04
P 0.01 TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
P 0.05 TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Relation B < C B < D B < E B < F B < G B < H

Score 4.05E-03 9.63E-05 1.29E-02 1.84E-02 7.69E-04 1.28E-01
P 0.01 TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE
P 0.05 TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE

Relation C < D C < E C < F G < H F < H C < G C < H

Score 7.67E-03 4.00E-01 2.58E-01 5.28E-02 2.99E-01 6.43E-02 2.37E-01
P 0.01 TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE
P 0.05 TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

The statistical significance of the differences in all-atom RMSD between the modelling methods as reported in Table 3.4. The differences are assessed using a t-test of a paired sample between two means. The truth logic given is for p values of 0.01 and 0.05.