Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2008 Feb 12;9:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-95

Table 5.

Comparison of individual EAs: DART-PCR vs. present paper approach. Individual EAs were obtained during data analyses as reported in Tables 3 and 4.

		DART-PCR approach				Present paper approach

Target	Dilution	EA individual	Arithmetic mean	SEM	Precision relative error (%)	EA₀individual	Arithmetic mean	SEM	Precision relative error (%)	*Error ratio*
SLC6A14 rat	original	1.88, 1.91, 1.80	1.92	0.02	1.1	1.83, 1.86, 1.86	1.91	0.01	0.7	*1.59*
	1 : 4	1.96, 2.00, 1.82				1.91, 1.91, 1.84
	1 : 16	1.96, 2.02, 1.90				1.95, 1.92, 1.91
	1 : 64	2.03, 1.89, 1.81				1.95, 1.93, 1.96
	1 : 256	2.03, 1.87, 1.96				1.97, 2.00, 1.90
SLC22A13 human	original	1.79, 1.85, 1.86	1.70	0.03	1.6	1.94, 1.92, 1.86	1.85	0.02	0.9	*1.76*
	1 : 4	1.78, 1.83, 1.86				1.82, 1.83, 1.89
	1 : 16	1.66, 1.61, 1.62				1.80, 1.73, 1.88
	1 : 64	1.63, 1.66, 1.62				1.97, 1.87, 1.81
	1 : 256	1.65, 1.56, 1.60				1.75, 1.90, 1.82
EMT pig	original	1.83, 1.83, 1.79	1.78	0.02	1.4	1.84, 1.83, 1.82	1.79	0.01	0.4	*3.14*
	1 : 4	1.85, 1.92, 1.64				1.81, 1.79, 1.76
	1 : 16	1.68, 1.82, 1.65				1.79, 1.80, 1.78
	1 : 64	1.75, 1.94, 1.69				1.82, 1.75, 1.80
	1 : 256	1.77, 1.83, 1.72				1.81, 1.75, 1.75
ETT chicken	original	1.95, 1.93, 2.06	1.89	0.02	0.9	1.87, 1.89, 1.87	1.88	0.01	0.4	*2.63*
	1 : 4	1.86, 1.81, 1.97				1.89, 1.88, 1.83
	1 : 16	1.87, 1.81, 1.85				1.87, 1.88, 1.82
	1 : 64	1.87, 1.92, 1.86				1.92, 1.89, 1.90
	1 : 256	1.80, 1.84, 1.86				1.88, 1.91, 1.87
GAPDH human	original	1.86, 1.78, 1.77	1.84	0.01	0.6	2.06, 1.94, 2.02	1.99	0.01	0.5	*1.24*
	1 : 4	1.91, 1.84, 1.82				1.97, 1.99, 2.00
	1 : 16	1.80, 1.83, 1.79				1.99, 1.98, 1.97
	1 : 64	1.86, 1.86, 1.85				1.96, 1.94, 2.01
	1 : 256	1.86, 1.88, 1.83				2.05, 1.97, 1.97