Table 3.
Mean sub scores for FAB
Experimental group | Control group | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | Post-test | P-value(t-value) | Pre-test | Post-test | P-value(t-value) | |
Similarities (conceptualization) | 1.6 (0.9) | 1.9 (0.8) | 0.083 (t=1.77) | 1.7 (0.8) | 1.9 (0.8) 0.086 | (t=1.76) |
Lexical fluency (mental flexibility) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.6) | 0.0048 (t=2.94) | 1.9 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.7) | 0.44 (t=0.78) |
Motor seriesz (programming) | 2.6 (0.6) | 2.8 (0.6) | 0.11 (t=1.64) | 2.7 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | 0.72 (t=0.36) |
Conflicting instructions (sensitivity to interference) | 2.7 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.3) | 0.026 (t=2.29) | 2.8 (0.6) | 2.8 (0.6) | 0.67 (t=0.42) |
Go-No Go (inhibitory control) | 1.9 (1.0) | 2.0 (1.0) | 0.89 (t=0.14) | 1.9 (1.0) | 1.8 (0.5) | -0.44 (t=0.78) |
Prehension behavior (environmental autonomy) | 3.0 (0.2) | 3.0 (0.0) | 0.16 (t=1.42) | 3.0 (0.1) | 3.0 (0.0) | 0.32 (t=0.16) |
Numbers in parenthesis are S.D. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test (two-tailed). Degree of freedom is 50 and 46 for each t-test of experimental and control groups, respectively