TABLE 2.

Multinomial regression analysis predicting inadequate and excessive prenatal care vs adequate prenatal care

Predictors	Inadequate vs adequate	Excessive vs adequate
Intervention group	0.93 (0.51−1.69)	1.35 (0.81−2.27)
History of STD (T1)
Yes	0.76 (0.41−1.39)	0.66 (0.40−1.10)
No	Referent	Referent
Smoked marijuana past year (T1)
Yes	2.04 (1.04−4.00)a	1.69 (0.96−2.94)
No	Referent	Referent
Parity
0	0.32 (0.14−0.76)b	1.02 (0.44−2.37)
1	0.55 (0.22−1.40)	1.31 (0.52−3.27)
2 or more	Referent	Referent
Race
African American	1.78 (0.94−3.37)	0.98 (0.62−1.56)
White/Latina/other	Referent	Referent
Social support (T1)
Low	0.59 (0.30−1.23)	1.24 (0.67−2.33)
High	Referent	Referent
Social support (T2)
Low	2.00 (0.96−4.17)	1.03 (0.55−1.93)
High	Referent	Referent
Self-esteem (T1)
Low	Referent	Referent
High	1.18 (0.61−2.33)	2.38 (1.33−4.16)a
Symptom distress (T2)
Low	Referent	Referent
High	0.52 (0.27−0.99)a	1.20 (0.73−2.00)
Readiness for caregiving (T2)
Low	0.88 (0.45−1.73)	1.76 (1.04−2.99)a
High	Referent	Referent
Prenatal care knowledge (T2)
Low	3.20 (1.71−5.68)b	1.12 (0.68−1.83)
High	Referent	Referent
Prenatal care satisfaction (T2)
Low	1.67 (0.90−3.10)	1.32 (0.78−2.21)
High	Referent	Referent

T1, second trimester; T2, third trimester.

^aP < .05.

^bP < .01.

Magriples. Prenatal health care beyond the obstetrics service. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.