Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;72(2):109–118.

Table I.

Comparison of administered dosages to recommended dosages of antimicrobials

Category of importance to human medicinea Antimicrobial (n; N) Administered dose range (mg/kg; IU/kg for penicillin) Mean administered dose (mg/kg; IU/kg for penicillin) Mean daily labelled doseb (mg/kg; IU/kg for penicillin) Mean administered dose/labelled dose 95% Confidence interval
I Ampicillin-sulbactamc (6; 2) 3.43–7.11 6.19 6.6 0.94 0.77–1.10
Ceftiofur (10; 2) 0.85–1.22 1.11 1 1.11 1.03–1.20
II Penicillind
 (40; 5) 9 434–42 857 22 396 9 000 2.34 2.09–2.59
 (15; 3) 13 158–34 331 19 444 12 000 1.58 1.06–2.10
 (50; 9) 6 000–33 333 18 592 21 000 0.89 0.80–0.97
Tilmicosin (149; 9) 5.50–31.25 10.35 10 1.05 1.00–1.09
Trimethoprim-sulfadoxinec (25; 9) 1.26–37.89 5.24 2.67 1.97 0.92–3.01
III Florfenicol (39; 9) 7.89–40.36 24.45 40 0.61 0.55–0.68
Oxytetracycline
 100 mg/mL (2; 1) 0.59–0.59 0.59 6.6 0.09 0.09–0.09
 200 mg/mL (76; 13) 1.22–27.91 17.64 20 0.88 0.83–0.94
Spectinomycin (13; 2) 4.40–11.00 7.98 10 0.80 0.67–0.93

n = number of treatment diary entries for the antimicrobial; N = number of farms with treatment diary entries for the antimicrobial of the 21 farms included in this analysis.

a

Ranking of importance to human medicine (15).

b

Based on the label instructions (18).

c

Doses for combination products were set for the constituent of interest (ampicillin and trimethoprim) and combination products were placed in a category higher than their constituents as per CIPARS 2002 (8).

d

Producers often did not distinguish which penicillin product they used in the treatment diary; thus penicillin data have more uncertainty than the antimicrobial doses provided here.