Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 19;584(Pt 1):97–109. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136291

Table 2.

Main experiment: mean (S.D.) EMG onset latency (ms), amplitude (mV) and probability of occurrence (%) for the simple RT in the sternocleidomastoid and paraspinal muscles

Latency Amplitude Probability
All trials HR–non-startle SCM 166.83 (53.95) 1.98 (2.27) n.a.
PARA 165.95 (55.99) 2.59 (3.00) n.a.
HR–startle SCM 102.62 (46.66) 3.03 (4.01) n.a.
PARA 104.83 (44.74) 4.09 (4.59) n.a.
EMG-defined startles HR–startle from the right* SCM left 62.02 (11.39) 2.85 (3.24) 41%
SCM right 62.53 (9.93) 3.15 (4.09) 37%
PARA left 61.35 (8.54) 4.66 (4.76) 35%
PARA right 63.76 (9.10) 5.56 (4.90) 33%

Mixed model analyses

All trials Stimulus (HR–non-startle/HR–startle) SCM *** n.a.
PARA *** n.a.
EMG-defined startles Startle side (left/right) SCM
PARA
Muscle side (left/right) SCM
PARA
Startle side × muscle side SCM
PARA

The table summarizes data as function of stimulus (HR–non-startle and HR–startle) and muscle (SCM and PARA) in all trials. This is followed by data as function of side of the startling stimulus (*only the right side is depicted here, as data values for the left side were comparable) and muscle side (left, right) in EMG-defined startles. EMG-defined startles included trials in which the onset latency preceded 83 ms for the SCM or 80 ms for the paraspinal muscles (PARA). Results of the mixed model analyses are shown for the log-transformed data as function of type of stimulus and muscle in all trials, followed by results of log-transformed data as function of the side of the startling stimulus and muscle side in the EMG-defined startles. ***P < 0.001; n.a., not applicable.