Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 9;584(Pt 1):347–357. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137075

Table 2.

Comparison of absolute and relative bias of estimate of PCO2 at baseline and during step changes in PCO2

Pa,CO2 PET,CO2 ePa,CO2
Baseline
 Mean ±s.d. (mmHg) 40 ± 4 42 ± 3* 42 ± 3*
 B ± lA (mmHg) 2 ± 4 2 ± 4
 RB ±s.d. (%) 5 ± 2 5 ± 3
4% CO2
 Mean ±s.d. (mmHg) 43 ± 4 47 ± 3* 46 ± 3
 B ± lA (mmHg) 4 ± 7 2 ± 6
 RB ±s.d. (%) 8 ± 4 5 ± 3
8% CO2
 Mean ±s.d. (mmHg) 55 ± 4 60 ± 3* 56 ± 3
 B ± lA (mmHg) 5 ± 6 0.2 ± 6
 RB ±s.d. (%) 9 ± 3 0.4 ± 3
Hypo 1
 Mean ±s.d. (mmHg) 35 ± 3 36 ± 4 34 ± 3
 B ± lA (mmHg) 2 ± 9 2 ± 12
 RB ±s.d. (%) 5 ± 5 5 ± 6
Hypo 2
 Mean ±s.d. (mmHg) 23 ± 4 23 ± 4 24 ± 4
 B ± lA (mmHg) 0.3 ± 3 0.9 ± 3
 RB ±s.d. (%) 1 ± 1 4 ± 1

Values are mean ±s.d.PET,CO2, end-tidal CO2; ePa,CO2, regression equation using both end-tidal PCO2 and tidal volume to estimat ePa,CO2; Pa,CO2, arterial PCO2; s.d., standard deviation; RB, relative bias; B, bias; LA, 95% limits of agreement (±1.96 ×s.d. of the bias).

*

Different from Pa,CO2 (P < 0.05);

different from ePa,CO2 (P < 0.05).