Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;178(3):1653–1660. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.085399

TABLE 2.

Results of selection experiments

Limiting nutrient
Competitors Glucose (%) n Maltose (%) n Succinate (%) n
lacI+ vs. lacI 10.28 ± 0.33 8 1.60 ± 0.17 7 9.69 ± 1.04 6
lacI ΔlacZ vs. lacI 8.31 ± 0.60 4 3.17 ± 0.25 3 5.95 ± 0.56 4
lacI ΔlacY vs. lacI 6.60 ± 0.79 4 5.83 ± 0.30 4 9.06 ± 1.05 4
lacI+ vs. lacI ΔlacZ 3.43 ± 0.63 3 −2.54 ± 0.28 5 3.05 ± 0.16 3
lacI+ vs. lacI ΔlacY 6.39 ± 0.08 2 6.09 ± 0.31 4 2.04 ± 0.33 4
lacI ΔRBS vs. lacI 10.89 ± 0.78 4 2.13 ± 1.06 4 9.76 ± 2.50 3
lacI+ vs. lacI ΔRBS −0.06 ± 0.61 2 0.08 ± 0.28 3 0.18 ± 0.17 2
lacIvs. lacIlacZ·ssrA 0.25 ± 0.24 3 5.07 1 5.60 ± 0.02 2
lacI+ vs. lacIlacZ·ssrA 10.29 ± 0.32 2 0 15.28 1
Competitors Glucose + 50 μm IPTG n
lacI+ vs. lacI 0.29 ± 0.17 3

The strain on the left is more fit by the percentage amount listed ± the standard error of the mean.