Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mech Dev. 2007 Oct 5;125(1-2):117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2007.09.013

Table 2. Interactions of dFS with TGF-β-type ligands of Drosophila.

Males expressing one of the seven ligands with the X-chromosomal A9-GAL4 were crossed to one copy (1x; columns 2-4) or two copies (2x; columns 5-7) of dFS. The number of males (columns 2 and 5) was used to calculate the expected number of females (columns 4 and 7). Co-expression of four ligands, dACT, MYO, DPP, and SCW, can significantly rescue a lethal line of dFS. While dACT can rescue 38% of females expressing two transgenic copies of dFS, increased levels of DPP and MYO only allow few animals to survive. In contrast, DAW decreases viability of a weak dFS line by 61% from 54% to 33% (bottom rows).

Ligand Males
without
A9-GAL4
Females
A9>ligand
>dFS (1x)
Rescue
females/
males
Males
without
A9-GAL4
Females
A9>ligand
>dFS (2x)
Rescue
females/
males
No ligand 213 0 0.0% 39 0 0.0%
DPP 86 49 57.0% 69 2 3.0%
SCW 105 16 15.2% 52 0 0.0%
GBB 182 0 0.0% 161 0 0.0%
dACT 97 73 75.3% 171 65 38.0%
DAW 112 0 0.0% 160 0 0.0%
MYO 137 28 20.4% 149 5 3.4%
MAV 70 17 24.2% 77 0 0.0%
Males
without
A9-GAL4
Females
A9>ligand
>weak dFS
Ratio
females/
males
No ligand 66 36 54.5%
DAW 48 16 33.3%