Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Apr;6(4):414–420. doi: 10.1038/nn1024

Table 1.

Comparisons of fMRI response amplitudes.

False alarms > misses
Hits > correct rejects
Experiment Subject V1 V2 V3 V3A V4 V1 V2 V3 V3A V4
DJH 0.033 0.030 0.108 0.263 0.006 0.000
BZL 0.119 0.015 0.081 0.119 0.195 0.000 0.022 0.001 0.000 0.001
a) Plaid bkgd ACH 0.044 0.558 0.806 0.002 0.009 0.012
DBR 0.001 0.004 0.026 0.001 0.313 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.008
All subjects 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.158 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

DJH 0.009 0.014 0.000 0.001 0.012 0.000
BZL 0.002 0.028 0.099 0.073 0.125 0.086 0.131 0.154 0.164 0.015
b) Noise bkgd AJN 0.030 0.089 0.005 0.047 0.048 0.001 0.013 0.000 0.001 0.000
DBR 0.016 0.037 0.075 0.005 0.053 0.158 0.151 0.033 0.004 0.016
All subjects 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Numbers in table are null-hypothesis probabilities (P-values, one-tailed t-test) for false alarms > misses and hits > correct rejects, for each subject and visual area in the two experiments: plaid background and noise background. Significant values (P < 0.05) are in bold.