Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep 7;16(2):261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.007

Table 3.

Relation of M:L BMD Ratio Groups to the Prevalence of BMLs

Medial Meniscal Damage M:L BMD Ratio Groups
1 (0.70 – 1.11) 2 (1.11 – 1.18) 3 (1.18 – 1.27) 4 (1.27 – 1.91) p for trend
Adjusted Odds Ratio of Medial Meniscal Damage (95% CIs) 1.0 (reference) 1.9 (1.3 – 2.9) 2.4 (1.6 – 3.6) 8.9 (5.1 – 15.5) p<0.0001
Medial Meniscal Damage Prevalence (All knees) (64/388) 16.5% (64/233) 27.5% (63/196) 32.1% (64/96) 66.7% -----
Medial Meniscal Damage Prevalence (K/L ≥ 2) (23/52) 44.2% (17/26) 65.4% (18/34) 52.9% (52/58) 89.7% -----
Medial Meniscal Damage Prevalence (K/L < 2) (41/336) 12.2% (47/207) 22.7% (45/162) 27.8% (12/38) 31.6% -----
Lateral Meniscal Damage M:L BMD Ratio Groups
1 (0.70 – 1.00) 2 (1.00 – 1.09) 3 (1.09 – 1.19) 4 (1.19 – 1.91) p for trend

Adjusted Odds Ratio of Lateral Meniscal Damage (95% CIs) 1.0 (reference) 0.3 (0.1 – 0.5) 0.2 (0.1 – 0.3) 0.2 (0.1 – 0.4) p=0.001
Lateral Meniscal Damage Prevalence (All knees) (26/87) 29.9% (24/223) 10.8% (27/358) 7.5% (24/245) 9.8% -----
Lateral Meniscal Damage Prevalence (K/L ≥ 2) (16/20) 80.0% (10/25) 40.0% (7/36) 19.4% (12/89) 13.5% -----
Lateral Meniscal Damage Prevalence (K/L < 2) (10/67) 14.9% (14/198) 7.1% (20/322) 6.2% (12/156) 7.7% -----

Odds Ratios are adjusted for age and sex.

Italicized results are meniscal damage prevalence measurements stratified by radiographic OA status