Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar 1;531(Pt 2):495–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0495i.x

Figure 5. Effect of temperature on excitatory junction potentials (EJPs) and slow depolarizations in hamster tibial artery smooth muscle cells during hibernation.

Figure 5

Aa and Ab, representative traces showing superimposed EJPs to a single stimulus (supramaximal voltage, 0.5 ms) from a control, a cold control and a hibernated animal (arrow) at 34°C (Aa) and 10°C (Ba). The traces from control and cold control animals were nearly identical. Ab-d and Bb-d, membrane responses to electrical field stimulation (supramaximal voltage, 0.5 ms, 6-10 pulses) from hibernated animals at 0.25 Hz (Ab and Bb), 0.5 Hz (Ac and Bc) and 1 Hz (Ad and Bd) at 34°C (A) and 10°C (B). Note that at both temperatures the amplitude of the EJPs from hibernated animals (arrow) are greater than those of control and cold control animals (Aa and Ba), and at 10°C as the frequency progresses (Bd), summations appear which were not present at 34°C (Ad). At 1 Hz at 34°C a slow depolarization emerges (Ad). Each vertical bar shows an electrical stimulus. Resting membrane potentials for Aa and Ba were -62 (control), -61 (cold control) and -60 mV (hibernated) at 34°C, and -59 (control), -60 (cold control) and -59 mV (hibernated) at 10°C, and for Ab, Ac, Ad, Bb, Bc and Bd were -64, -62, -62, -59, -60 and -59 mV, respectively. The lowest scale bar refers to Ab-d and Bb-d.