Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec 15;537(Pt 3):1047–1058. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.01047.x

Table 1.

Details of epidural volleys recorded in each of the six patients studied

Type and latency of volleys (ms) evoked at supra-threshold intensities

Patient Type of stimulation Active motor threshold (%) Lowest threshold volley (s) L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
1 Lateral anodal 30 L1; L2; L3 6.2 7.3 8.7
Vertex anodal 25 L2; L3 7.3 8.7
Magnetic PA 44 L2 6.2 7.3 8.7 10.2 11.8
Magnetic ML 50 L2 6.2 7.3 8.7 10.2 11.8
2 Lateral anodal 24 L1 5.7
Vertex anodal 25 L2 5.7 7.0 8.7
Magnetic PA 65 L2 5.7 7.0 8.7 10.3 11.8
Magnetic ML 45 L2 5.7 7.0 8.7 10.3 11.8
3 Lateral anodal 38 L1; L2 6.2 7.8
Vertex anodal 50 L1 6.2
Magnetic PA 55 L2 6.2 7.8 9.4 11.2
Magnetic ML 70 L2 6.2 7.8 9.4
4 Lateral anodal 43 L1 6.0
Vertex anodal 37 L2 7.3
Magnetic PA 41 L2 7.3 9.0 10.4 12.1
5 Lateral anodal 35 L1 4.3
Vertex anodal 40 L1 4.3
Magnetic PA 61 L2 5.8
6 Lateral anodal 32 L1 3.6
Vertex anodal 35 L2 5.0
Magnetic PA 38 L2 5.0 6.7 8.2

PA postero-anterior direction, ML medio-lateral direction.