Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Aug 25;160(1):65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2007.08.007

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Demonstrates a significant positive relationship between phasic EMGGG (% control) during recovery at 20 minutes and phasic EMGGG (% control) during hypoxia. This correlation declined to r=0.6, p=0.06 after eliminating the highest right point (marked with X); but when adjusted for age in the multiple regression model, the coefficient of EMGGG during hypoxia was significant, see text for explanation.