Table 3.
Possible taxonomically distinctive entities. Intraspecific clusters of individuals that might be unrecognized species, probability of chance reciprocal monophyly (p, α ≤ 0.01), specimen details, fixed diagnostic mutations, and mean distances between the clusters of the same species.
| Species | p | Collecting locale or subspecies (sampling) | Fixed mutations | Mean D (%) among clusters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brachyramphus brevirostris | 3.0 × 10-3 | a. Aleutians, Russia (3) | a vs b = 7 | a vs b = 1.23 |
| b. East Alaska (6) | ||||
| Pygoscelis papua | 9.7 × 10-5 | a. Macquarie Island (6) | a vs b = 15 | a vs b = 2.43 |
| b. Falkland Island (7) | ||||
| Gelochelidon nilotica | 1.8 × 10-3 | a. Small form of the beak (3) | a vs b = 11 | a vs b = 1.74 |
| 9.5 × 10-3 | b. Large form of the beak (3) | a vs c = 10 | a vs c = 1.84 | |
| c. South America, Russia (4) | b vs c = 5 | b vs c = 1.74 | ||
| Sturnella magna | 9.5 × 10-3 | a. Texas (4) | a vs b = 22 | a vs b = 4.03 |
| b. Texas, Ontario, Miami (3) | ||||
| Tringa totanus | 9.5 × 10-3 | a. Iceland (4) | a vs b = 6 | a vs b = 0.95 |
| b. Vietnam, Australia (3) | ||||
| Eudyptula minor | 8.3 × 10-17 | a. New Zealand (NZ)(21) | a vs b = 28 | a vs b = 3.82 |
| b. Australia (21) |