Table 3.
SVMHC | WAPP | PC+MHC | TAP+MHC | |||||
Allele | MCC | SP | SE | MCC | SP | SE | MCC | MCC |
HLA-A*0201 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
HLA-B*2705 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
HLA-A*01 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.93 |
HLA-A*03 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
Prediction accuracies for the two alleles using different approaches. An increase in all three cases can be seen for WAPP compared to SVMHC. Furthermore, the results from combining the MHC prediction with either proteasomal cleavage (PC) or TAP are shown.