Table 1.
χ1 | χ2 | χ3 | χ′2 | χ′1 | Cα-Cα | Cβ-Cβ | Energy (kcal/mole)a | |
1hpu Cb1 | −44.3 | −136.5 | 90.9 | 95.8 | 42.7 | 5.83 | 3.95 | 3.10 |
2 | −147.2 | 120.4 | −109.6 | 157.3 | 41.9 | 5.83 | 3.95 | 5.49 |
3 | −145.0 | 65.9 | 112.3 | −155.7 | 156.7 | 5.83 | 3.95 | 5.55 |
5′NT-C chain A | −103.6 | 169.2 | −78.1 | −126.0 | −60.3 | 6.11 | 3.60 | 11.69 |
5′NT-C chain B | −91.9 | 177.5 | −94.0 | −120.6 | −62.1 | 6.16 | 3.59 | 8.91 |
1hp1c | −73.35 | 66.3 | 127.6 | −83.5 | −146.1 | 5.60 | 4.39 | 5.47 |
5′NT-O1 chain A | −67.4 | 178.6 | −96.2 | 74.5 | −158.1 | 5.29 | 4.22 | 9.77 |
5′NT-O1 chain B | −70.4 | 174.3 | −94.7 | 78.2 | −166.4 | 5.35 | 4.13 | 4.04 |
5′NT-O2 | −65.3 | 65.4 | 108.2 | −80.4 | −149.8 | 5.27 | 4.24 | 4.69 |
a Total energy of the energy bond according to the algorithm of Hazes and Dijkstra (1988).
b 1hpu C: chain C of PDB ID 1hpu used as model for the most closed form of bacterial 5′NT, three possible conformations were predicted.
c 1hp1 PDB ID for the most open form of bacterial 5′NT