Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;13(2):400–411. doi: 10.1110/ps.03348304

Table 3.

The success rate and the average Z-score of different all-atom potentials compared to that of the DFIRE-SCM potential

Source RAPDF-all-atom KBP-all-atom DFIRE-all-atom DFIRE-SCM
4state 7/7 (3.01)a 7/7 (3.24) 6/7 (3.49) 6/7 (3.94)
lattice_ssfit 8/8 (7.18) 8/8 (6.61) 8/8 (9.47) 8/8 (6.19)
lmds 3/10 (−0.52) 3/10 (0.53) 7/10 (0.90) 3/10 (2.56)
fisa 1/4 (1.27) 0/4 (1.21) 3/4 (4.80) 3/4 (4.70)
fisa_casp3 3/3 (4.09) 0/3 (2.08) 3/3 (5.40) 3/3 (6.05)
CASP4 20/23 (2.17) 20/23 (2.93) 19/23 (2.61) 19/23 (3.15)
Rosetta 24/41 (3.18) 23/41 (3.17) 31/41 (3.91) 33/41 (4.90)
Summary 66/96 (2.82 ± 2.87) 61/96 (3.01 ± 2.46) 77/96 (3.80 ± 3.31) 75/96 (4.30 ± 2.22)
75/96 (top5)b 70/96 (top5) 84/96 (top5) 85/96 (top5)

a The first number is the number of native structures ranked number one; the second number is total number of proteins in the decoy set. The numbers in parentheses are the average Z-scores.

b The first number is the number of native structures that are with top 5 rank.