Table 4.
The ranking of the native structures and the Z-scores for the 21 docking decoy sets
| PDB IDa | 1chg/1hpt | 1sup/2ci2 | 2ptn/4pti | 5cha/2ovo | 1a2p/1a19 | lavz | 1bgs | 1brc |
| LLSb | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| DFIRE-SCMc | 1/4.79 | 1/2.13 | 1/2.84 | 1/1.96 | 1/2.06 | 4/1.66 | 1/2.36 | 1/2.18 |
| 1fss | 1ugh | 1wql | 2pcc | 2sic | 1cgi | 1dfj | %Successd | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10/15 (67%) | |
| 1/1.97 | 1/3.53 | 1/2.66 | 4/2.09 | 1/2.33 | 1/2.71 | 1/2.51 | 13/15 (87%) | |
| PDB IDe | 1ahw | 1bvk | 1dqj | 1mlc | 1wej | 2kai | %Successd | |
| LLSb | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 1/6 (17%) | |
| DFIRE-SCMc | 1/2.05 | 1/1.85 | 1/1.68 | 1/1.95 | 2/1.84 | 2/1.81 | 4/6 (67%) |
a Dimers.
b The all-atom knowledge-based potential due to Lu, Lu and Skolnick derived from the interfacial structures of a dimer database (Lu et al. 2003). The number in each cell indicates the rank of the native structure. (The Z-score was not reported in Lu et al. (2003)).
c The DFIRE-based potential derived from a monomer database (Zhou and Zhou 2002). The two numbers in each cell represent the rank of native structure and the Z-score, respectively.
d The overall success rate based on the first rank.
e Trimers.