Table 5.
The Z-scores for 25 monomeric and 31 docking Rosetta decoy sets
Monomeric decoys | Docking decoys | ||||
PDB ID | KMBa | DFIRE-SCMb | PDB ID | KMBa | DFIRE-SCMb |
1a32 | 4.59 | 1.92 | 1a2yc | 2.47 | 0.97 |
1ail | 8.22 | 2.17 | 1qfuc | 0.01 | 2.14 |
1am3 | 2.39 | 2.14 | 1cz8c | 6.04 | 1.45 |
1bq9 | 6.37 | 3.07 | 1wejc | 0.79 | −0.45 |
1cc5 | −1.53 | 1.46 | 1dqjc | 5.80 | 1.65 |
1cei | 5.80 | 4.38 | 1e6jc | 5.28 | 1.96 |
1csp | 2.43 | 4.57 | 1egjc | 0.72 | 1.04 |
1ctf | 6.01 | 4.11 | 1eo8c | 0.96 | 0.82 |
1dol | 0.57 | 3.34 | 1fdlc | 2.66 | 1.13 |
1hyp | 3.30 | 5.21 | 1fj1c | 1.51 | 2.01 |
1lfb | 0.45 | 1.90 | 1g7hc | 3.38 | 1.13 |
1msi | 3.82 | 2.28 | 1ic4c | 5.29 | 1.82 |
1mzm | 2.79 | 2.07 | 1jhlc | 2.31 | 0.72 |
1orc | 3.57 | 2.83 | 1jrhc | 8.56 | 1.35 |
1pgx | 4.47 | 3.17 | 1mlcc | 2.33 | 1.20 |
1ptq | 3.18 | 0.48 | 1ncac | 0.50 | 2.23 |
1r69 | 3.36 | 4.52 | 1nsnc | −0.36 | 0.25 |
1tif | 7.09 | 2.56 | 1ospc | 7.82 | 1.61 |
1tuc | 4.38 | 2.10 | 1acb | 11.33 | 1.84 |
1utg | 4.80 | 1.25 | 1avz | 1.05 | 0.73 |
1vcc | 5.50 | 2.73 | 1brs | 3.43 | 1.44 |
1vif | 4.47 | 2.27 | 1cho | 12.06 | 2.51 |
2fxb | 2.48 | 3.86 | 1ugh | 2.34 | 2.52 |
5icb | 5.61 | 3.95 | 2btf | 4.18 | 1.73 |
5pti | 6.62 | 1.92 | 1mda | −1.03 | 0.52 |
1ppf | 8.77 | 1.95 | |||
1spb | 14.06 | 3.36 | |||
2ptc | 6.18 | 1.69 | |||
1cse | 9.16 | 1.91 | |||
2pcc | −0.87 | 0.59 | |||
1fin | 3.65 | 3.08 | |||
Average | 4.03 ± 2.18 | 2.81 ± 1.16 | 4.21 ± 3.91 | 1.51 ± 0.80 | |
%successd | 88% | 96% | 74% | 74% |
a The Kortemme-Morozov-Baker empirical free-energy function enhanced by orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential (Kortemme et al. 2003).
b This work.
c Antibody antigen complex.
d The success rate based on the number of decoy sets with Z-score >1 as in Ref. (Kortemme et al. 2003).