Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 13;357(11):1113–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct074213

Figure 2. Conventional Ventilation as Compared with Protective Ventilation.

Figure 2

This example of ventilation of a 70-kg patient with ARDS shows that conventional ventilation at a tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of body weight and an end-expiratory pressure of 0 cm of water (Panel A) can lead to alveolar overdistention (at peak inflation) and collapse (at the end of exhalation). Protective ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 ml per kilogram (Panel B) limits overinflation and end-expiratory collapse by providing a low tidal volume and an adequate positive end-expiratory pressure. Adapted from Tobin.18

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure