Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec;13(12):3298–3313. doi: 10.1110/ps.04846604

Table 4.

A full coverage plan for three Tfa models with potential templates in Table 3 with discriminability Δ = 2, ambiguity region 10–19 Å, and number of experiments N = 6

Distances Feasibilities Coverage pattern
Residue Pair 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 vs 2 1 vs 3 2 vs 1 2 vs 3 3 vs 1 3 vs 2
ASN 59 VAL 68 26.95 28.33 5.63 L L H 0 0 0 0 1 1
ALA 40 ALA 63 21.19 6.86 40.99 L H L 0 0 1 1 0 0
GLN 8 ASP 83 8.61 24.04 23.62 H L L 1 1 0 0 0 0
THR 75 SER 88 6.79 6.92 24.52 H H L 0 1 0 1 0 0
LEU 18 ASP 83 29.98 8.40 8.95 L H H 0 0 1 0 1 0
LYS 13 ASN 22 4.94 19.88 3.15 H L H 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 3 H, 3 L 3 H, 3 L 3 H, 3 L 2 2 2 2 2 2

Each model pair is covered twice (a coverage pattern value of 1 indicates support for the first model over the second), and each model is expecting the same number (3) of high feasibility and low feasibility cross-links, a perfect balanced design [ib(S, Δ) = 0].