Table 3. Mating success in relation to territorial success and female genotype.

Male Line	Female Line 46		Female Line 65		Female Line137		Total
	Scores	P =	Scores	P =	Scores	P =	Scores	P =
Agg	12, 10, 1, 4	0.326	16, 5, 0, 6	0.002	7, 13, 4, 3	0.391	35, 28, 5, 13	0.060
W145	5, 16, 0, 6	0.555	8, 4, 6, 9	0.252	11, 10, 2, 4	0.648	24, 30, 8, 19	0.234
W75	12, 4, 6, 5	0.411	8, 9, 5, 5	1.000	7, 11, 3, 6	1.000	27, 24, 14, 16	0.649
W134	14, 2, 8, 3	0.371	13, 7, 2, 5	0.185	9, 3, 7, 8	0.239	36, 12, 17, 16	0.035
W17	8, 6, 3, 10	0.120	4, 8, 5, 10	1.000	6, 8, 5, 8	1.000	18, 22, 13, 28	0.258
W58	1, 10, 5, 11	0.350	6, 8, 2, 11	0.209	5, 8, 11, 3	0.054	12, 26, 18, 25	0.366
W89	8, 5, 6, 8	0.450	8, 5, 8, 6	1.000	7, 4, 7, 9	0.440	23, 14, 21, 23	0.263
W83	6, 3, 11, 7	1.000	7, 3, 11, 6	1.000	3, 5, 11, 8	0.420	16, 11, 33, 21	1.000
W23	2, 6, 12, 7	0.103	4, 2, 10, 11	0.648	2, 10, 11, 4	0.006	8, 18, 33, 22	0.018
Neu	4, 1, 11, 11	0.342	3, 7, 9, 8	0.424	4, 2, 13, 8	1.000	11, 10, 33, 27	1.000

Scores shown for each combination of male and female genotype are, in order: mating success with territorial success; failure to mate with territorial success; mating success with territorial failure; and failure to mate with territorial failure.

Interactions that demonstrate a significant one-way relationship between territorial and mating success are highlighted in bold.