Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Feb;62(2):149–160. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.2.149

Table 2.

Mass-Optimized Time to Maturity and Postnatal Growth Rate for Different Mammalian Orders in Comparison With Mass-Optimized Adult Life Span

Time to Maturity Versus Adult Life Span
Growth Rate Versus Adult Life Span
Order No. of Species % Predicted Time to Maturity % Predicted Adult Life Span No. of Species % Predicted Growth Rate % Predicted Adult Life Span
Eutherians
 Artiodactyla 119 75% 80% 24 131% 77%
 Carnivora 115 98% 107% 42 133% 107%
 Chiroptera 25 238% 247% 13 108% 270%
 Insectivora 19 86% 56% 13 160% 61%
 Lagomorpha 7 52% 73% 4 162% 69%
 Macroscelidea 4 52% 104% 1 ND ND
 Perissodactyla 11 111% 97% 2 ND ND
 Primates 98 231% 180% 20 33% 196%
 Rodentia 126 64% 76% 58 94% 78%
 Sirenia 3 132% 152% 1 ND ND
 Xenarthra 11 99% 135% 4 105% 181%
Marsupials
 Dasyuromorphia 21 136% 56% 1 ND ND
 Didelphimorphia 4 57% 46% 1 ND ND
 Diprotodontia 31 85% 91% 13 87% 96%
 Peramelemorphia 4 36% 51% 3 85% 49%

Notes: Values represent the average residuals of the time to maturity, adult life span, and growth rate calculated from regression analysis and expressed as a percentage of the expected value estimated from the allometric equation. Only orders with data for at least three species are displayed. Taxonomy was retrieved from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) (http://www.itis.usda.gov).

ND = not determined.