Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 Nov;79(2):218–228. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30532

TABLE II.

Histomorphometry From Control and Implanted (Experimental) Limbs. The p Values in the Far Right Column Indicate Whether a Significant Difference Exists Between the Experimental and Control

Control Limb Experimental p Values
Scaffold
 MAR (um/day) 0.0007 ± 0.0004 0.0010 ± 0.0008 0.9
 Lbl sur (%) 1.7 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 2.8 0.05
 BFR/BS 1.3E-5 ± 0.8E-5 8.2E-5 ± 5.9E-5 0.05
Periscaffold
 MAR (um/day) 0.0009 ± 0.0005 0.0015 ± 0.0007 0.05
 Lbl sur (%) 1.7 ± 0.9 10.5 ± 8.7 0.05
 BFR/BS 1.7E-5 ± 0.9E-5 1.8E-4 ± 1.6E-4 0.01
Deep
 MAR (um/day) 0.0006 ± 0.0003 0.0018 ± 0.0013 0.1
 Lbl sur (%) 2.5 ± 1.7 8.9 ± 6.3 0.1
 BFR/BS 2.2E-5 ± 1.9E-5 2.0E-4 ± 2.1E-4 0.1
Superficial
 MAR (um/day) 0.0007 ± 0.0003 0.0006 ± 0.0009 0.6
 Lbl sur (%) 1.6 ± 1.2 7.2 ± 6.2 0.05
 BFR/BS 1.1E-5 ± 1.1E-5 0.8E-5 ± 1.5E-4 0.7

MAR, Mineral Apposition Rate; Lbl, Labeled Surface; BFR, Bone Formation Rate; BS, Bone Surface.