Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Aug 7;28(3):430–450. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.014

Table 2.

Design information for the 24 studies examined in this review.

Authors Sample size Research design Sampling design Assignment
Bischof, Rumpf, Hapke, Meyer, & John (2000) 135 cross-sectional convenience none
Bond, Kaskutas, & Weisner (2003) 655 longitudinal consecutive none
Carlson, Dilts, & Radcliff (1994) 71 cross-sectional entire population none
Flynn, Alvarez, Jason, Olson, & Davis, (2006) 274 cross-sectional convenience none
Galanter, Talbott, Gallegos, & Rubenstone (1990) 100 cross-sectional cohort none
George & Tucker (1996) 45 cross-sectional convenience none
Humphreys, Finney, & Moos (1994) 439 longitudinal convenience none
Humphreys, Mankowski, Moos, & Finney (1999) 2867 longitudinal consecutive none
Humphreys, Mavis, & Stoffelmayr (1994) 558 longitudinal consecutive none
Humphreys, Moos, & Cohen (1997) 395 longitudinal convenience none
Humphreys & Noke (1997) 2337 longitudinal consecutive none
Kaskutas, Bond, & Humphreys (2002) 654 longitudinal consecutive none
Longabaugh, Wirtz, Zweben, & Stout (1998) 806 longitudinal convenience random
Majer, Jason, Ferrari, Venable, & Olson (2002) 100 cross-sectional convenience none
Ouimette, Moos, & Finney (1998) 3018 longitudinal consecutive none
Pagano, Friend, Tonigan, & Stout (2004) 1501 longitudinal convenience random
Project MATCH Research Group (1998a) 1726 longitudinal convenience random
Project MATCH Research Group (1998b) 506 longitudinal convenience random
Rush (2002) 125 cross-sectional convenience none
Sheeren (1988) 59 cross-sectional convenience none
Snow, Prochaska, & Rossi (1994) 191 cross-sectional convenience none
Timko, Finney, & Moos (2005) 466 longitudinal convenience none
Zemore & Kaskutas (2004) 200 cross-sectional stratified convenience none
Zemore, Kaskutas, & Ammon (2004) 279 longitudinal convenience random